The long awaited O’Higgins Report, which examined allegations of Garda corruption, as published on the 11th May 2016 has understandably been the subject of much media commentary since and will likely remain a prominent story for some time. As the fallout from the findings of the report coupled with ancillary revelations still coming to light, increased public scrutiny of An Garda Síochána as an organisation and those who wield power from within will be an inevitable repercussion.
The basis for the report was an intrinsic investigation by Mr Justice Kevin O’ Higgins into various claims by whistleblower Garda Maurice McCabe of alleged Garda corruption in the Cavan-Monaghan Division.
Although no evidence of corruption per se was found in the report within the specific area division, It did highly commend Garda McCabe for his whistleblowing endeavours and found he had “performed a genuine public service at considerable personal cost” and “acted out of genuine and legitimate concerns”.
What is whistleblowing?
The act of whistleblowing is a vitally important one for a democratic, fair and civic society. A whistleblower is commonly defined as “any individual, such as an employee, supplier, contractor or client, who exposes or reports any type of information or activity that could be deemed illegal, unethical or wrong either internally or externally about a public or private organisation”.
The majority of legitimate whistleblowers do so out of their perceived civic duty to stop or prevent alleged wrongdoing, which if continued could be harmful to their fellow citizens. Therefore whistleblowers can be of invaluable assistance to government departments and regulators in particular, in providing crucial information that can mitigate risks to public service delivery.
For instance, the exposure of abuse to patients at the HSE run Áras Attracta nursing facility in Swinford, Co. Mayo, was dependent on the bravery of three whistleblowers, which prompted RTE to investigate the facility and broadcast its controversial findings in 2014. Members of staff who featured on the disturbing RTE piece, were subsequently arrested and some found guilty of assault in February 2016.
Victimised
Despite such heroics and necessary unearthing of misconduct and illegality by whistleblowers, those who choose to do the right thing, can become victimised and ostracised by those who are benefiting from such wrongdoing. Therefore, what protections are afforded to whistleblowers in Ireland and does such protection go far enough?
The Protected Disclosures Act, 2014
The primary legislation aimed at protecting whistleblowers is the Protected Disclosures Act, 2014. It was enacted in July of that year and for the first time in Ireland provided comprehensive whistleblowing legislation across all sectors.
The Act protects and safeguards workers in all sectors, In accordance with international best practice. While the concept of ‘worker’ includes employees (both public and private sector), contractors, trainees, agency staff, former employees and interns and members of an Garda Siochana.
Protected Disclosures
The act provides for ‘protected disclosures’ of relevant information by a worker, who must have a ‘reasonable belief’ such information ‘tends to show wrongdoing’.
The motivation of the worker in making such a disclosure is irrelevant, when determining liability, although it may be taken into consideration in any subsequent reduction of a compensation award.
Furthermore, the onus of proof rests on the employer rather than on the whistleblower making the allegation- in effect the disclosure is presumed to be a ‘protected disclosure’ unless it can be proven to the contrary.
“Relevant wrongdoings” under the Act include the following:
- commission of a criminal offence
- miscarriage of justice
- non-compliance with a legal obligation, contractual or statutory
- endangerment of health and safety
- misuse of public monies or mismanagement by a public official
- damage to the environment
- concealment or destruction of information relating to any of the above.
Specific Protections
The Act provides whistleblowers with a range of specific protections, which far outweigh existing protections in other areas of employment legislation.
For instance where an employee makes a protected disclosure, that employee can be awarded compensation of up to five years remuneration for unfair dismissal on the grounds of having made a protected disclosure.
This is in sharp contrast to the two years remuneration available under the existing unfair dismissals legislation.
Furthermore, where an employee who claims to have been dismissed or threatened with dismissal for having made a ‘protected disclosure’. They can apply to the Circuit Court to restrain their employers from carrying out the dismissal.
There is also a right of action under the law of Tort where it can be shown that the whistleblower, or family member have suffered detriment, coercion, intimidation, harassment or discrimination as a result of such disclosures.
Some other important protections afforded to whistleblowers under the Act is that of immunity from criminal prosecution for such disclosures and, qualified privilege under defamation law. This means they can’t be sued by those who are exposed by such revelations.
Another essential protection is that of privacy entitlements for whistleblowers, who are afforded identity protection, albeit with some exceptions.
Conclusion
Certain business and industry advocates at the time this Act was been introduced, opposed its introduction on various grounds as expected. Which ranged from legitimate fears that some level of self-serving workers would abuse such procedures and act contrary to the spirit in which it was intended. While others argued it unfairly increased administrative burdens for employers and organisation in an already saturated regulatory regime.
Legislation and particularly one which tries to mitigate against systemic illegality and wrongdoing, will always polarise certain individuals and groups and will inevitably be open to isolated instances of abuse. Notwithstanding this, it is important to recognise the enormous contribution and essential role, such legitimate whistleblowers perform when their honourable actions become the catalyst to positive change and cultural improvements.
Therefore an onus lies with all employers and organisations to ensure their workers who try to do the right thing in difficult circumstances, are adequately protected and applauded, rather than ostracised and demeaned.
J.O.S Solicitors provides tailored Employment Law and HR Compliance to Business and individuals. If you would like J.O.S Solicitors to assist your business with its HR needs or to simply discuss your options about any employment law or HR compliance issue, such as whistleblowing requirements. Then please contact us
Jason O’ Sullivan, is a Solicitor and Public Affairs Consultant at J.O.S Solicitors
Disclaimer
This publication is for guidance purposes only. It does not constitute legal or professional advice. No liability is accepted by J.O.S Solicitors for any action taken or not taken in reliance on the information set out in this publication. Any and all information is subject to change and professional or legal advice should be obtained before taking or refraining from any action as a result of the contents of this publication.
Author
Recent Posts
